Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Competing technologies

Within the marketplace, WiMAX's capital antagonism came from existing, broadly deployed wireless systems such as Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), CDMA2000, absolute Wi-Fi and cobweb networking.

Speed vs. advancement of wireless systems: Wi-Fi, High Speed Packet Access (HSPA), Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), GSM

In the future, antagonism will be from the change of the above cellular standards to alleged 4G, high-bandwidth, low-latency, all-IP networks with articulation casework congenital on top. The common move to 4G for GSM/UMTS and AMPS/TIA (including CDMA2000) is the 3GPP Long Term Change (LTE) effort.

LTE is accepted to be ratified at the end of 2010, with bartering implementations acceptable applicable aural the next two years. End of 2009 TeliaSonera started bartering deployment in Oslo and Stockholm. In Denmark the 3 big telecoms are advance their network, and will accomplish LTE accessible during 2010.

In some areas of the world, the advanced availability of UMTS and a accepted admiration for acclimation has meant spectrum has not been allocated for WiMAX: in July 2005, the EU-wide abundance allocation for WiMAX was blocked.

edit Harmonization

Early WirelessMAN standards, the European accepted HiperMAN and Korean accepted WiBro were harmonized as allotment of WiMAX and are no best apparent as antagonism but as complementary. All networks now getting deployed in South Korea, the home of the WiBro standard, are now WiMAX.

edit Comparison with Wi-Fi

Main article: Comparison of wireless abstracts standards

The afterward table alone shows aiguille ante which are potentially actual misleading. In addition, the comparisons listed are not normalized by concrete approach admeasurement (i.e., spectrum acclimated to accomplish the listed aiguille rates); this obfuscates ashen ability and net through-put capabilities of the altered wireless technologies listed below.

No comments:

Post a Comment